http://ir.dspu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/2058 2026-04-28T15:55:15Z 2026-04-28T15:55:15Z Ivangorodsky, Kostiantyn http://ir.dspu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/6068 2025-05-12T07:27:34Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Название: Methodological aspects of the reconstruction of the east-slavs ethnic historyin the modern ukrainian historiography Авторы: Ivangorodsky, Kostiantyn Краткий осмотр (реферат): Modern Ukrainian historians, during the reconstruction of the East Slavs’ ethnic history before the Mongol era, rarely adhere to clearly formulated methodological guidelines and theoretical postulates that allow such studying. Therefore, for contemporary Ukrainian historiography of this problem are inherent outdated rudiments of «Soviet positivism», misunderstanding and reluctance to apply modern western approaches, conscious self-isolation within the national narrative. The main idea of the article is to show that in modern Ukrainian historiography there are no satisfactory methodological principles for the scientific reconstruction of the East Slavs’ ethnic history, and most Ukrainian researchers are still confused by the conditions of methodological pluralism. The purpose of the study is to analyze the methodological aspects of the reconstruction of the East Slavs ethnic history in contemporary Ukrainian historiography. This scientific topic has not been analyzed in historiography till now, so the problem, we have raised, has acquired such a value for the first time. The methodology of the research is determined by the critical analysis and is based on the principles of historicism, systematic, scientific, ethnological verification, objectivity, ethnosocial constructivism, moderate relativism, methodological pluralism. In order to solve this problem, were used such historiographical methods as analysis, synthesis, «second level historiography», comparative, hermeneutic, abstract, historical-genetic, typological, terminological analysis. The scientific novelty is determined by the fact that for the first time, with the method of remote monitoring and analysis (so-called method of «second level historiography») is clarified the development of methodological foundations of the newest Ukrainian scientists’ researches devoted to the reconstruction of the East-Slavic communities’ ethnic history in the pre-Mongol era. The comparative approach allowed us to trace the influence of methodological pluralism on modern Ukrainian historiography and to establish the significant methodological confusion and ignorance with new tendencies among historians and other humanitarians. Conclusions. The reconstruction of the East Slavic communities’ ethnic history, including the Ukrainians ethnogenesis, is one of the key issues in modern Ukrainian historiography. The proposed analysis shows that in Ukrainian historical science there is no satisfactory transformation of the identified segment of cognition, and most Ukrainian humanitarians are confused in the terms of methodological pluralism. On the other hand, many leading historiographers in modern Ukraine mark the significant changes in this area during last decades, that allows us to believe in improving the situation, including the situation in ancient ethnical history researches.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Masnenko, Vitaliy http://ir.dspu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/6067 2025-05-12T07:24:49Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Название: The textbook of N. Polonska-Vasylenko "Ukrainian historiography" in the context of methodological tradition of the statehood school Авторы: Masnenko, Vitaliy Краткий осмотр (реферат): The aim of the paper is to elucidate the meaningful content of the textbook (lecture notes) written by N. Polonska-Vasylenko «Ukrainian Historiography» and its conformity to the conceptual foundations of the statehood direction in Ukrainian historiography of the post-war period. The research methodology is based on the basic principles of textual analysis and the use of historiographical cognitive methods, in particular historiographical analysis and synthesis, as well as biographical method. Scientific novelty consists in the fact that for the first time the indicated didactic text became the subject of historiographical examination, and a comparative analysis with other historiographical and historical texts of the researcher was conducted. This allowed to broaden the vision of the personality of N. Polonska-Vasylenko as a historian of Ukrainian historical science and a higher education tutor. Thus, the main methodological principles of the state direction of Ukrainian historiography within the emigration of the postwar period were clarified. Conclusions. N. Polonska-Vasylenko’s text of «Ukrainian Historiography» is an interesting example of the Ukrainian didactic historical writing, which is based on the state methodological and scholarly traditions. It is characteristic that the author criticizes the previous developments on certain historiographical topics, in particular, the impartiality and objectivity of the chroniclers, ideological constructions of the continuity of the Kyivs'ka Rus’ tradition by the Moscow princes, etc. Consideration of Ukrainian historical thought covers a significant chronological range: from the Kyivs'ka Rus’ chronicles to scientific works of the early 1970's. To a certain extent, this is a brief essay on the development not only of Ukrainian historiography, but also of source study, especially concerning the medieval and early modern eras. The author also analyzes the intellectual genesis of the great-power Moscow tradition. The text of this manual also reflects the results of a significant part of the previous scientific achievements of the author.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Popp, Ruslana Petrivna http://ir.dspu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/6066 2025-05-12T07:20:38Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Название: The activities of the military tribunal of the mia troops of Drohobych region (1947): documentary evidence Авторы: Popp, Ruslana Petrivna Краткий осмотр (реферат): The aim of the study is to publish and analyze the document on the activities of the Military Tribunal of the MIA troops of Drohobych region in 1947, to show the importance of its scientific use. Methodology is based on the principles of historic, systemic and scientific character, verification, author's objectivity, moderate narrative constructivism, use of general scientific methods (analysis, synthesis, generalization) and specially-historical (historical-genetic, historical and typological, historical and systematic) methods. Scientific novelty lies in the fact that the document on the activities of the Military Tribunal of the MIA troops of Drohobych region in 1947 is published for the first time. In modern historiography this issue is still studied too little. It is shown that the document provides information about the nature of charges, system and terms of punishment, regulatory field, which is extremely important for the objective coverage of the repressive policy of the Stalinist totalitarian regime in Drohobych region in early post-war years. Summary. The document is an important source that helps to recreate the methods of imposing the totalitarian regime in Drohobych region in the early post-war years. It shows that the restoring Soviet authorities relied on the system of punitive-repressive bodies, whose main task was to fight the Ukrainian liberation movement and local population, which supported it. Participation, assistance, support of the OUN and UPA, and just unwillingness to be a snitch, was punished very strictly, for at least 10 years of imprisonment and more, persons who have escaped a forced labour mobilization were subjected to harassment. To a separate category of those who were brought to criminal responsibility belonged employees the military officers of the Soviet punitive-repressive bodies. The number of convicts and the length of sentences indicate the scale of violations among law enforcement officers.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z Antoniuk, Yaroslav http://ir.dspu.edu.ua/jspui/handle/123456789/6065 2025-05-12T07:16:58Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z

Название: Stepan bandera's safeguards: achievements and defeats (1945 - 1959) Авторы: Antoniuk, Yaroslav Краткий осмотр (реферат): The purpose of the study is to elucidate the structure principles and activities of the security units which served for the leader of the overseas part of Organization of the Ukrainian Nationalists (hereinafter – ZCh OUN), Stepan Bandera. Another task of this publication is to analyze planned and committed attempts on his life. The methodology of the research is based on a combination of general scientific (analysis, synthesis, generalization) and special-historical (historical-genetic, historical-typological, historical-systematic) methods with the principles of historicism, systemicity, scientism and verification. The scientific novelty of the study is that for the first time in Ukrainian liberation movement historiography the structure and peculiarities of the functioning of the ZCh OUN leader’s security guards have been clarified, on the basis of previously unknown archival documents. The coverage of this topic not only supplements the biographical research devoted to Stepan Bandera but also considers the recondite episodes of the ZCh OUN Security Service (hereinafter – SB) activity. Conclusion. The analysis of Stepan Bandera security guards’ activity reveals both its advantages and disadvantages acquired during its advance. It was ascertained that the security unit was a part of the SB ZCh OUN. The first guard-commander was Mykhailo Banias – «Grytsko», he headed several junior guards. After him, the previously mentioned post was temporarily occupied by: Andriy Pelenychka – «Plevak», Yaroslav Bychkovych and Myron Karpynets. Vasyl Zbrozhyk – «Gayokha» was the last Bandera’s security guard supervisor, Vasyl Shushko was his last personal guardian, Vasyl Skolozdra was his driver and Dmytro Myskiv was his family security guard. Notwithstanding certain specialization pattern, the security guards functions were not quite clear and often duplicated. During 15 years of work, the SB ZCh OUN had succeeded in neutralizing more than five assassinations attempts on Stepan Bandera. Nevertheless, given the inadequacy of forces and capabilities, the confrontation between SB and KGB (Committee for State Security of the Soviet Union) could not have lasted for too long.

2018-01-01T00:00:00Z